District 211 Chiefs (Grey) HS
Rating
Record (W-L-T)
W-L-T
Goals (GF-GA)
GF-GA
Rankings
Trophies
Rating Math
| Date | Opponent | W/L/T | Score | GD | Opp Rating | Points | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10 | Oak Park River Forest HS | W | 5 - 3 | 2 | 83.70 | 85.70 | 2.48 |
| Sep 17 | Chicago North (#1) HS | L | 1 - 7 | -6 | 88.95 | 82.95 | -0.27 |
| Sep 20 | Highland Park HS | L | 2 - 7 | -5 | 87.12 | 82.12 | -1.10 |
| Sep 24 | Kings HS | L | 1 - 4 | -3 | 84.04 | 81.04 | -2.18 |
| Sep 27 | Chicago Central HS | L | 1 - 5 | -4 | 84.41 | 80.41 | -2.81 |
| Oct 1 | PREP (Varsity) HS | L | 0 - 5 | -5 | 86.86 | 81.86 | -1.36 |
| Oct 4 | New Trier (Blue) HS | L | 0 - 5 | -5 | 87.41 | 82.41 | -0.81 |
| Oct 6 | Southwest Michigan Blades HS | L | 2 - 4 | -2 | 85.58 | 83.58 | 0.36 |
| Oct 7 | Carroll HS | L | 3 - 7 | -4 | 86.19 | 82.19 | -1.03 |
| Oct 14 | Zionsville HS | L | 2 - 3 | -1 | 85.88 | 84.88 | 1.66 |
| Oct 17 | Notre Dame College Prep | L | 3 - 5 | -2 | 86.29 | 84.29 | 1.07 |
| Oct 24 | Deerfield HS | L | 3 - 8 | -5 | 87.37 | 82.37 | -0.85 |
| Oct 26 | Evanston HS | L | 1 - 7 | -6 | 87.82 | 81.82 | -1.40 |
| Oct 29 | Chicago North (#1) HS | L | 1 - 14 | -7 | 88.95 | 81.95 | -1.27 |
| Nov 3 | Evanston HS | L | 0 - 5 | -5 | 87.82 | 82.82 | -0.40 |
| Nov 4 | Lake Forest (Gold) HS | L | 1 - 7 | -6 | 88.34 | 82.34 | -0.88 |
| Nov 4 | Waubonsie/Metea HS | L | 0 - 9 | -7 | 87.98 | 80.98 | -2.24 |
| Nov 5 | Maine Township HS | L | 2 - 6 | -4 | 86.81 | 82.81 | -0.41 |
| Nov 11 | Evanston HS | L | 0 - 4 | -4 | 87.82 | 83.82 | 0.60 |
| Nov 12 | Highland Park HS | L | 0 - 5 | -5 | 87.12 | 82.12 | -1.10 |
| Nov 16 | Buffalo Grove/Hersey/Wheeling HS | L | 3 - 6 | -3 | 86.50 | 83.50 | 0.28 |
| Nov 24 | Waubonsie/Metea HS | L | 2 - 7 | -5 | 87.98 | 82.98 | -0.24 |
| Nov 24 | Buffalo Grove/Hersey/Wheeling HS | L | 2 - 8 | -6 | 86.50 | 80.50 | -2.72 |
| Nov 25 | Edwardsville HS | W | 8 - 3 | 5 | 84.44 | 89.44 | 6.22 |
| Nov 25 | Kings HS | W | 3 - 2 | 1 | 84.04 | 85.04 | 1.82 |
| Dec 2 | Chicago Central HS | L | 0 - 9 | -7 | 84.41 | 77.41 | -5.81 |
| Dec 3 | Deerfield HS | T | 3 - 3 | 0 | 87.37 | 87.37 | 4.15 |
| Dec 6 | Libertyville/Vernon Hills IceCats HS | L | 1 - 3 | -2 | 86.71 | 84.71 | 1.49 |
| Dec 14 | PREP (Varsity) HS | L | 3 - 4 | -1 | 86.86 | 85.86 | 2.64 |
| Dec 16 | Buffalo Grove/Hersey/Wheeling HS | L | 2 - 7 | -5 | 86.50 | 81.50 | -1.72 |
| Dec 17 | Barrington HS | W | 3 - 0 | 3 | 82.99 | 85.99 | 2.77 |
| Jan 10 | Barrington HS | W | 3 - 1 | 2 | 82.99 | 84.99 | 1.77 |
| Jan 14 | Zionsville HS | L | 1 - 3 | -2 | 85.88 | 83.88 | 0.66 |
| Jan 20 | Libertyville/Vernon Hills IceCats HS | T | 4 - 4 | 0 | 86.71 | 86.71 | 3.49 |
| Jan 21 | New Trier (Blue) HS | L | 1 - 4 | -3 | 87.41 | 84.41 | 1.19 |
| Jan 24 | Notre Dame College Prep | L | 1 - 4 | -3 | 86.29 | 83.29 | 0.07 |
| Jan 28 | Kings HS | L | 3 - 4 | -1 | 84.04 | 83.04 | -0.18 |
| Jan 31 | Chicago North (#1) HS | L | 0 - 5 | -5 | 88.95 | 83.95 | 0.73 |
| Feb 1 | Deerfield HS | L | 2 - 9 | -7 | 87.37 | 80.37 | -2.85 |
| Feb 5 | Buffalo Grove/Hersey/Wheeling HS | L | 2 - 5 | -3 | 86.50 | 83.50 | 0.28 |
| Feb 7 | Barrington HS | W | 3 - 1 | 2 | 82.99 | 84.99 | 1.77 |
| Feb 10 | New Trier (Blue) HS | L | 0 - 6 | -6 | 87.41 | 81.41 | -1.81 |
| Feb 12 | Highland Park HS | L | 0 - 6 | -6 | 87.12 | 81.12 | -2.10 |
| Totals (43 games) | 6 - 35 - 2 | 78 - 224 | -136 | 3714.60 | 3578.60 | -0.04 | |
| Averages | -3.16 | 86.38 | 83.22 | 0.00 | |||
Note: The maximum goal differential for any one game is 7 The average goal differential (GD) should equal this team's AGD from the rankings page. The average "Opp Rating" should equal this team's SCHED. The average "Points" is the team's rating. The average "+/-" should equal 0.00, but it is possible that rounding errors of 0.01 will occur occasionally. Larger error numbers indicate that a game scores has been changed or deleted since the last ratings calculation. The points and +/- columns give you an indication as to whether the team did better or worse than expected based upon MYHockey's ratings. Positive +/- numbers mean the team did better than expected and "helped" its rating. Games with negative numbers mean the team performed worse than expected.
